For a solution to be "complete," it must?

For a solution to be considered "complete," it must thoroughly address each critical aspect of the problem at hand. This means that the solution is not just addressing one facet or a superficial layer of the issue but is exploring all dimensions that are essential to achieving a thorough resolution.

In a tactical or technical context, like that which might be covered in the SFWO TTCC, this means understanding the complexities of the scenario and addressing all relevant factors, including potential consequences, implications, and the needs of those involved. This comprehensive approach helps ensure that the solution is effective and sustainable, resolving not just the immediate issues but also preventing future complications related to the problem.

Considering why the other options do not fit the criteria for a "complete" solution provides further insight. Simply including all possible options regardless of their relevance would lead to confusion and inefficient resource allocation and could detract from the clarity of the solution. Focusing only on the primary issue neglects interconnected secondary problems that might affect the outcome. Likewise, while including feedback from stakeholders is undoubtedly valuable, it cannot alone guarantee a solution's completeness unless those inputs comprehensively cover all critical aspects of the problem. Thus, a complete solution stands out as one that thoughtfully and deeply addresses all relevant aspects of the issue at